“When you get into the larger aircraft it becomes like a hotel, with dozens of staff supporting the plane based in a galley area down below. You have very comprehensive cooking facilities, and on larger aircraft we have looked at theatres, with spiral staircases and a Steinway grand piano. The limitations for what you can put inside a plane are pretty much the limits of physics, and even money cannot always overcome that. Even so, people are still always trying to push [the limits]. ”
FAA explains rules for flying candidates
The FAA has responded to a query about the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, which changed the law with respect to what candidates for federal
election must pay when traveling on noncommercial aircraft. The act requires presidential, vice presidential and senatorial candidates to reimburse the aircraft provider at the fair market charter rate, while House of Representatives candidates are prohibited from traveling on a non-Part 135 aircraft unless they are operated by the federal or a state government or owned by the candidate or immediate family members. However, current Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations regarding reimbursement are inconsistent with the act, leaving operators uncertain about whether they can accept reimbursement. In its written response, the agency said Part 91 operators can accept reimbursement based on the act while FEC regulations are being revised.